A project to help the project - a Meta-Project for research-creation.
In two areas :
In many context :
The context of research-creation is complex because you are observing angles of your creative process in order to produce a documented thesis on those topics. In a sense, this part is not related to the end-results you produce but what you are thinking about it. Saying this like that might looks simple but when you are in it, it is not. At least not in an academician research-creation master degree. It seems relevant to say I'll limits myself really quick in describing the context and its difficulties but before, I want to overlook what I've seen down the line. Here I assumed that doctorate do master the difference between producing and researching but can they really act intelligently in these intertwined contexts?
I'd would doubt it, not because I am prejudging them but because I've observed enough situations that tells me they can not stay objective when being exposed to the germination energy of artistic creation (whatever their creator m are directed by them or not).
I've seen many Iterations of artist having been confused by opinions when they should have got scientific questioning.
It is not helpful to get on the producing channel when you would be supposed to be on the scientific channel.
It is not my purpose here to change that right away but it is common to be on the wrong channel of requiring to get a perspective on your creative process and understand what is scientifically going on or receive education about it rather than art critique or suggestions.
That leads to : being assisted in receiving scientific educational feedback and resources along with reviewing the state of the art with all that is in it to advance its state to the desired vision.