We need to follow scientific method, give our theories falsifiability conditions, and test experiments to turn them into real theories that the scientific community can adopt and accept.
Following this mandate, we can classify observations into the following: (Assume that these observations are specific)
Since a lot of my writings are a bunch of psychological unfalsifiable observations, we'll classify them too! Classify and crystallize everything!
Definition monster speaks! 👹
Crystallize - to kill knowledge by oversimplifying it into a dead category or a set of categories, then thinking of it as "complete" — something that doesn't need any improvement. E.g. "Labeling frameworks and paradigms with words ending with -isms is the most effective way to crystallize knowledge."
(These observations are usually philosophical, psychological, and logical in nature. They're mostly abstractions and inferences derived from experiences)
Notice the ambigous unfalsifiable practical reference on number four. From there we can infer that fundamental knowledge or universal principles are the kind of truths nearest to the "absolute truths" that they always apply at every situation no matter what.
They are thought of as the most basic patterns of nature that can be seen everywhere as long as we look hard enough.
Those who are aware of these fundamental natural patterns of nature would be able to see how it affects them and other people around them in real-time, allowing them to use these patterns to their advantage.
Now that I'm writing it, this section in this article is as vague as the life goals of an introverted intuitive feeling perceiver. The true nature of Unfalsifiability feels real when you close your right eye, but looks hazy when you close your left eye.
This is where philosophical and psychological paradigms come in, to find a firm ground we can stand on before we perform any experiments and analysis.
For the purpose of this article, let's define Unfalsifiability as an epistemological concept that refers to the capacity of an idea, theory, or concept to fail or undergo scientific testing. Only those who can be proven wrong through testing can be proven right.
It can be easily demonstrated as something like "what if we were born yesterday but we are just implanted with fake memories and placed in this fake world?"
Usually, this logical form of Unfalsifiability is meaningless and empty, that nothing happens nor no one would care regardless of whether it is true or not. This effectively kills science and progress.
Another form of Unfalsifiability is Cognitive Dissonance, where people would unintentionally distort facts and evidences in front of them to protect their ego. This happens in situations where admitting failure became too threatening for them to even consider.
In this case, the person involved would look madly desperate that they unintentionally craft thousands of excuses and alibis per minute just to prove that they didn't fail.
At its most basic form, all invalid and impractical forms of Unfalsifiability involves some variant of "no middle ground fallacy" as demonstrated above or "tunnel vision fallacy", which is something like "but this is the only wayyy!!".
The kind of Unfalsifiability I aim aiming for and writing theories about usually involves practical categories made up of natural patterns arranged in an imperfect/evolutionary way such that they would be able to temporarily bridge the empty gaps of language and science.
Interestingly enough, I might also be having some form of Cognitive Dissonance right now because I seem to stubbornly refuse admitting that my theories are awfully sheep compared to other cool theories made by licensed scientists.
In that case, I will defuse my own Cognitive Dissonance by accepting the possibility that I might be wrong so I'm going to add some form of Unfalsifiability analysis to each one of my theories next time to make them more credible and awesome.
1st Instinct to avoid
2nd Instinct to confront
3rd Instinct to accept
4th Instinct to understand
5th Instinct to connect
6th Instinct to experience
7th Instinct to transcend
These categories seek to explain the the person's instincts when confronted with an uncomfortable situation. Most of the time, we rely on the first instinct to avoid to run away from danger, but when once we attained enough wisdom and experience, we proceed to the next stage of instincts.
Place a person in an uncomfortable situation. Observe what they do. If any of their actions doesn't fall to the 7 categories listed above, then I am wrong.
Do the same thing above for some inexperienced child or teenage person, and if their first reactions to experiencing or anticipating the uncomfortable situation for the first time isn't the instinct to avoid, then I am wrong.
These categories aren't useful for anything except for giving random words and explanations to something that happens often. Still, it's cool to think "Oh, so she's on the third instinct now, learning to accept things as they are, impressive growth".
Further elaboration, simplification, and testing are required if this behavioral model would be turned into theory.
These categories seek to explain and categorize the true motivations of a human being, with sexual motivations as the most conscious, easy, and powerful motivation, and the spiritual motivations as the most unconscious, invisible, difficult, and weakest motivation.
My theory is too vague to be proven wrong. I must first rigidly define the seven states of a human being so it may become falsifiable.
Examples:
1. I'm an unemployed dropped-out.
2. I have hearing difficulties and friendless.
3. I'm simply born weak and unlucky.
4. I'm scared of talking to people.
5. People around me made me like this.
6. I don't like doing nothing and wasting time.
7. I didn't accept that job, I'll do this instead.
This is merely a prototype model made from guesswork, which states that the best way to understand any human being including ourselves is through the decisions and action they made. The second best is through their desires and values, and the third best is the personal stories they tell themselves.
Additionally, it infers that the worst way to understand any human being is through how other people see them, the jobs they have, and the roles they fulfill the society.
This assumes that the person/psychologist who observes others truly knows how to find and interpret people's actions, desires, stories, and fears, in a psychologically neutral manner.
None. This theory is unfalsifiable and unprovable with no clearly defined set and concepts. It merely exist as another attempt to explain the process of self-discovery and self-awareness. The practical uses are interesting though.
So that the person who may read this article find the words to explain the visceral, mind-shattering, and soul-crushing, process of falling in-love.
None — that emotion is too vague, chaotic, and subjective.
Here, all human appeals are enumerated according to their effectiveness in descending order. Note that their effectiveness is inversely proportional to their popularity and usage.
The most effective human appeal is the altruistic humanistic appeal to the individual. As they say, no one is more appealing than the person who sees and accepts for who you are, without treating you as something to be fixed or something to be idolized.
Within randomized controlled experiments, try to use each human appeal in isolation and in random order to make the person do something. Depending on the results, the rankings and terms can be changed.
Metaphorical chains that bind people to the material flow of life, the eternal hamster wheel of work and suffering. None of them are bad on their own.
It's arranged on ascending order depending on their practical uses and spiritual importance.
The deeper your meditation is, the higher your levels of consciousness would increase. Effects of meditation arranged in ascending order based on a person's meditation frequency in all meanings of the term.
None, too subjective and spiritual in nature. Extremely difficult to measure.
"AHHAHAHAH I added truckloads of humility in this article and now it looks very credible and professional! Now I'm the best and coolest person in the world! Bow to me peasants!"
"I find it extremely infuriating that the only way the entire world would believe someone is when their ideas were turned into fun inventions that would help them, or when the person has spent their entire lives proving it and died trying to protect and polish it."
"The world doesn't need to believe me. If I can believe in myself, then that's more than enough."